Is Everyone A Market Timer?
June 30, 2022
Everyone times the market. Some people buy when they have money, and sell when they need money, while others use methods that are more sophisticated.
—Marian McClellan
It’s an interesting question: Is everyone a market timer? OK, probably not everyone. But in some ways, the decline experienced in U.S. stocks this year highlights the difficulty that many market participants – and dare I say some financial advisors – have in remaining patient as they go on a bottom-fishing expedition.
The objective of such actions is clear: Advisors are attempting to improve their average price by buying when stocks are repriced lower. But we believe the CATALYST for these actions is a form of recency bias driven by the Fed’s introduction of nearly unlimited capital into the system every time even a minor drawdown in stocks has occurred since the Financial Crisis.
If you assume this time is no different, why not buy?
That’s a big assumption. And it gives outsized weight to the experience of the last 12-years without considering the experience of the decades upon decades before that. When you consider a larger sample size, the data yields very different outcomes and actions.
The point is that indiscriminate buying based on falling stock prices is not a plan. Timing the market is not a plan. Often both of these disregard the fact that you might be wrong. In this month’s Co-Founders’ Note, we discuss how perceived opportunities can turn into traps without the proper plan to tell you when you’re wrong. It is an old adage to which we subscribe: “Stay humble or the market will do it for you.”
But first, here’s a summary of our take on what transpired in the markets in June.
Asset-Level Overview: Market Talking Points for Financial Advisors
Equities & Real Estate
In June, the S&P 500 officially reached the dreaded bear market designation, by exceeding a 20% decline from its previous peak. Mid- and small-cap equities fared even worse, both declining more than 25% from their 1-year high. Even value and high-dividend stocks, holding up much better than their cap-weighted counterparts YTD, succumbed to renewed selling pressure. The result is that no segment of U.S. stocks has been able to maintain an uptrend. Hence, Blueprint Investment Partners portfolios will continue to be underweight U.S. equities as we enter July.
As U.S. equities were hitting their lows for the months, international equities were holding up a bit better, but still incurred losses and remain in downtrends. After lackluster performance in 2021 compared to U.S. equities, the longer-term performance of this segment continues to be dismal. In fact, since January 2021, foreign developed and emerging market equities have produced a cumulative loss of 13% and 15% respectively. As has been the case for much of this time, all Blueprint Investment Partners portfolios continue to have minimum exposures to international equities.
Repeating the same themes of domestic and international equities, real estate securities also produced losses in June. Rising interest rates have finally dented demand, causing downtrends to remain entrenched. After reducing exposures heading into June, all Blueprint Investment Partners portfolios will remain underweight to this asset class in July.
Fixed Income & Alts
After showing the smallest of signs of a bottom for the first time since late February, fixed income assets renewed their declines in June, making new lows by mid-month. All Blueprint Investment Partners portfolios continue to be underweight fixed income instruments of any meaningful duration, as they have since the third quarter of 2021.
Despite seemingly having so many factors that would support a gold rally – from inflation to war – this asset class continues to underwhelm. As June closes, exposure in Blueprint Investment Partners portfolios will decrease, as a long-term downtrend has developed in addition to the already established intermediate-term downtrend. With the Fed intent of quashing inflation, it would seem the opportunity has been missed for gold. On the other hand, just as things seemed so lined up for a rally that didn’t happen, perhaps another counterintuitive move is in store that will finally produce a strong return.
3 Potential Catalysts for Trend Changes: Giving Clients the Context
Past: The final revision to the Q1’22 gross domestic product report came out, and it shows that real GDP (inflation-adjusted) was -1.6% annualized. While the revision was small from the previous report, the composition changes were disappointing. Consumer spending on both goods and services were revised down significantly and was offset by inventory accumulation, which is less than ideal. Building inventories for businesses in an environment with slowing spending is unhelpful for longer-term growth if those businesses must sell at discounted prices in a few months.
Present: Consumers’ short-term outlook for the U.S. economy dropped to its lowest point in nearly a decade on concerns about inflation. The Conference Board’s consumer-confidence index, which hints at American attitudes toward jobs and the economy, dropped to 98.7 in June from 103.2 in May. The board’s expectations index, which measures consumers’ short-term outlook about the labor market, business, and income, tumbled to 66.4, its lowest reading since March 2013. The University of Michigan’s closely followed survey of consumer sentiment, which polls consumer attitudes on personal finance, dropped to its lowest point on record.
Future: Yields on U.S. Treasuries are rising abruptly as the Federal Reserve lifts interest rates to try to cool inflation. This could increase the federal government’s borrowing costs over time to levels higher than currently projected. Government spending on net interest costs in the fiscal year that began last October totaled about $311 billion through May, a nearly 30% increase from the same period a year earlier. Some budget analysts say an increase in the federal government’s borrowing costs could crowd out spending for other priorities and add to the overall U.S. debt held by the public. Some analysts suggest that, when the Federal Reserve cuts rates in the future, it should all balance out. However, this leaves out the possibility that inflation could be persistently higher, leading to persistently higher rates.
Seeing Opportunity: Buying Products vs. Buying Strategies
A perceived opportunity can turn into a trap without the proper plan to tell you when you’re wrong.
—Jon Robinson & Brandon Langley
Let's Talk
If you’d like to learn more about Blueprint's repeatable and disciplined application of a systematic investing process